March 5, 2020 Democrats Issue Death Threat Against Trump Justices In United States Supreme Court Obliterating Socialism By: Sorcha Faal,…
March 5, 2020
Democrats Issue Death Threat Against Trump Justices In United States Supreme Court Obliterating Socialism
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Source: What Does It Mean
A frightening new Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing potential conflict zones having a threat of violence to include Turkey rushing special forces troops to the Greek border to prevent Athens from pushing migrants back and the British Royal Navy taking to the seas to prevent a “French Blockade” of fishing grounds, astonishingly includes on this list the United States—where over the past fortnight, President Donald Trump appointed US Federal Judges have begun laying waste to large swaths of leftist America while the United States Supreme Court has figuratively marched the “Deep State” to the guillotine for execution, as well as their firing a kill shot at leftist federal judges—but while this highest court in America began a hearing on a baby-killing abortion case yesterday, saw it being the proverbial “straw that broke the camels back” which unleashed a full-on socialist Democrat Party firestorm—a firestorm ignited when top Democrat Party US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer went into a rage and threatened the lives of Trump appointed Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh with his directly warning them: “I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price…YOU WON’T KNOW WHAT HIT YOU”—a death threat immediately responded to by Trump who declared: “This is a direct & dangerous threat to the U.S. Supreme Court by Schumer. If a Republican did this, he or she would be arrested, or impeached. Serious action MUST be taken NOW!”—with Trump’s declaration being swiftly followed by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issuing a rare rebuke warning to Schumer saying: “Statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter”—a rare rebuke from this high court leader being followed by Republican Party US Senator Josh Hawley bringing a motion to censure Schumer—and now sees Republican Party US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell preparing to pour gasoline on this deadly controversy by addressing it on the Senate floor during his opening remarks this morning where he will openly denounce Schumer. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, at the center of this socialist ignited firestorm threatening the lives of Trump’s appointed Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh is a distorted legal tactic used by leftist US Federal Judges for decades to advance the genocidal baby-killing demonic practice of abortion—a tactic that has seen these leftist judges overturning hundreds of State laws against abortion because of what they “might” do, instead of their ruling on what these State anti-abortion laws actually say as the US Constitution demands they do.
On one of the most fateful days in modern American history, this report details, the United States Supreme Court entered into its records the notice “The application for stay presented to Justice Scalia and by him referred to the Court is granted, and the issuance of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit” on 29 June 2015—the meaning of which was that this high court would hear and decide the case known as Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt—a case Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia had personally guided to this high court in order to destroy the distorted leftist legal tactic used to advance abortion over States Rights—but before Justice Scalia could do so, saw him mysteriously turning up dead on 13 February 2016—a mysterious death President Trump himself called into question because of Justice Scalia being discovered dead with a pillow over his face—a death, however, that couldn’t stop this case from proceeding through the Supreme Court against the backdrop of the volatile presidential election between Trump and Clinton, also, occurring in 2016—a case made even more complex because it would be decided by an evenly split high court—all of which resulted in one of the most unique Supreme Court rulings in modern American history being made on 27 June 2016—made unique because while Chief Justice Roberts broke a 4-4 tie to side with his leftist justices in the ruling on this case, Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas joined—thus showing that all Chief Justice Roberts did was sweep the issues of this case out of his court until such time another conservative anti-abortion justice could join him—which Trump speedily provided him with.
After having swept away the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case in 2016, this report continues, Chief Justice Roberts was reinforced when President Trump gave him two more conservative Associate Justices, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh—which then allowed Roberts to place on the Supreme Court’s docket the case June Medical Services LLC v. Russo on 28 January 2019—a case dealing with same exact issue of the distorted legal tactics being used by leftist federal judges to advance their genocidal abortion cause—that was argued in this high court yesterday where virtually every seat in the courtroom was filled, which doesn’t always happen even in some blockbuster cases—and just 10 minutes before the start of court, saw Ashley Kavanaugh, the wife of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, arriving to take her seat in the VIP section—who was soon followed by Joanna Breyer, the wife of Justice Stephen Breyer, and Jane Roberts, the wife of the Chief Justice.
Though the issue involving the June Medical Services LLC v. Russo case are being described to the American people by their fake news leftist media as having to do with if the State of Louisiana is able to enact a law requiring that abortion clinic doctors have hospital admitting privileges, this report explains, nothing could be further from the truth—as the core issues of this case are if leftist federal judges can allow third-party litigants to present “maybe-might be-possible” evidence against a State’s laws to have them overturned—or if State’s laws can only be overturned if they’re found to be unconstitutional—a critical distinction as for decades leftist federal judges have been making up things not found in either the law or constitution to support their pro-abortion rulings—a necessity, these leftists argued yesterday, otherwise States could eventually ban abortion all together—but whose distortion of law, logic and the constitution itself, even had liberal Associate Justice Breyer despairingly stating the obvious:
How do you deal with this?
I have read the briefs. I understand there are good arguments on both sides.
Indeed, in the country people have very strong feelings and a lot of people morally think it’s wrong and a lot of people morally think the opposite is wrong.
And in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v.Casey, and the later cases, I think personally the court is struggling with the problem of what kind of rule of law do you have in a country that contains both sorts of people.
The answer to Associate Justice Breyer’s questions of “how do you will deal this” and “what kind of rule of law do you have in a country that contains both sorts of people”, this report concludes, was given during the arguments heard yesterday by this high courts majority conservative justices, including Chief Justice Roberts—with conservative Justice Kavanaugh driving straight to the heart of this issue with his question: “Are you saying that admitting privileges laws are always unconstitutional, such that we don’t have to look at the facts state by state? Or are you saying that actually you do look at the facts state by state, and in some states, admitting privileges laws could be constitutional, if they impose no burdens?”—the leftist answers to which then saw conservative Justice Samuel Alito deridingly calling them “amazing” or “highly debatable”—thus providing to everyone watching the unmistakable knowing that the Supreme Court is preparing to rule against these leftists and give pro-life Americans a much deserved victory—that, in turn, caused deranged socialist Democrat Party leader Schumer to rush from the courtroom and threaten the lives of Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh—but before his doing so, would have been wise to notice what happened one day earlier during the 4 March election called Super Tuesday—where President Trump trounced the vote totals of all past incumbent presidents in American history in Blue, Purple and Red States—a trouncing of historic proportions fueled by the tens-of-millions of American citizens fed up with the leftist genocide of their nation’s defenseless babies—and in Trump have finally found their champion to protect with all of his power the rights of the unborn.
March 5, 2020 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.