SORCHA: “World Braces As United States Supreme Court Marches Socialist “Deep State” To Guillotine”
March 3, 2020
World Braces As United States Supreme Court Marches Socialist “Deep State” To Guillotine
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
An intriguing new Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today says that since President Donald Trump unexpectedly expressed his willingness this past Friday to hold a summit with the leaders of Russia, China, Britain and France (the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council) to discuss arms control, further signs being seen that the United States government is beginning to detangle itself from its three-year long fit of anti-Russian hysteria include their stunningly yesterday deleting from their North Korean sanctions list Russian oil producer Independent Petroleum Company (IPC) and four names of its subsidiary IPC-Primornefteprodukt—that was near immediately shockingly followed, also yesterday, by the US Department of Justice appearing to balk at even starting their civil trial against the Russian company Special Counsel Robert Mueller had filed his “joke indictment” against to harm Trump—all of which is occurring against the backdrop of the US Supreme Court figuratively marching the socialist “Deep State” to the guillotine in order to behead them in the case Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau scheduled to be argued before them later today—a case involving this “fourth branch of government that skirts the usual system of checks and balances by exercising powers reserved for each of the three branches, frequently without any oversight or control by anyone”—one of whose main socialist leaders of is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director who “is one of the most powerful and unaccountable people in Washington”—and whomever this unaccountable director may be, “has to the power rework a large part of America’s financial system and there’s almost nothing any elected official could do about it”—which explains why the world is bracing for the outcome of this case, as it’s hard to believe the “Deep State” will accept their looming execution without a fight.[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, on 4 March 1789 the founding document of America called The Constitution Of The United States took effect—a document that divided the US government into three co-equal parts called the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches—neither of whom were given supremacy over their co-equal branches—and all of three of which are directly accountable to the American people and no one else.
Under Article 1-Section 8 of this Constitution, this report explains, the Legislative Branch is given the power “To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States” and “ To make Rules for the Government”—a power the Legislative Branch used to create and fund numerous government departments and agencies used by the Executive Branch for the efficient management of their nation—but which 137-years after this Constitution came into effect, saw this entire process breaking down.
The breakdown of this Constitutional process, this report notes, centered on the control of the government departments and agencies created by the Legislative Branch (US Congress) but resided in the Executive Branch (the President)—a dispute solved by the US Supreme Court in the 1926 case called Myers v. United States—a case decided in a 70-page ruling written by Chief Justice William Howard Taft, about which is said:
Taft’s lengthy opinion in Myers concluded that constitutional structure and separation of powers principles made the president’s removal power regarding officers exercising executive power “illimitable.”
“From the division” of powers into three branches, Taft wrote, “the reasonable construction of the Constitution must be that the branches should be kept separate in all cases in which they were not expressly blended, and the Constitution should be expounded to blend them no more than it affirmatively requires.”
Taft understood that when an agency exercises executive power, such as by filing suit to enforce a federal consumer‐protection law, the officers of that agency are exercising the power vested by the Constitution in the president alone.
For that exercise of the president’s power to be constitutionally valid, the president must retain ultimate control over its use.
Ten years after the Myers v. United States case was decided and gave the President full control over his own Executive Branch, this report continues, the United States was in the grip of the Great Depression and being ruled over by its socialist Democrat Party leader President Franklin D. Roosevelt—who along with his totally controlled socialist Democrat Party controlled US Congress, “saw these progressive politicians wildest dreams come alive”—wild dreams that saw them creating what are called “FDR’s Alphabet Soup”—that describes the numerous government departments and agencies these socialists created—creations that became monstrous, however, in 1936 when an “under siege” United States Supreme Court decided a case forced on them by Roosevelt and his socialist Democrats called Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S.—the decision of which effectively gutted the Myers v. UnitedStates ruling issued just ten-years earlier, and that made government departments and agencies a separate power unto themselves not accountable to any branch of government or even the American voters—and about which the world renowned late US Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia scathingly wrote, in 1988, what history has now recorded as “The Great Dissent”:
One can hardly grieve for the shoddy treatment given today to Humphrey’s Executor, which, after all, accorded the same indignity (with much less justification) to Chief Justice Taft’s opinion 10 years earlier in Myers v. United States gutting, in six quick pages devoid of textual or historical precedent for the novel principle it set forth, a carefully researched and reasoned 70-page opinion.
It is in fact comforting to witness the reality that he who lives by the ipse dixit (dogmatic and unproven statement) dies by the ipse dixit.
But one must grieve for the Constitution.
Like socialist President Roosevelt did before him during the chaos of the Great Depression, this report continues, President Barack Obama, likewise, used the chaos of the 2008 Financial Crisis as cover to further solidify socialist control over the entire US economy—total control exhibited by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau created by Obama and his fellow socialist Democrats in 2010, all of whom were led by then radical socialist Harvard law professor, and now Democrat Party US Senator Elizabeth Warren—but which is shockingly not part of any branch of the US government—but the private bank known as the US Federal Reserve—thus making it unaccountable to anyone but itself—and about which it’s now being warned:
Even in a town where so much power is wielded, it isn’t going too far to say that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director is one of the most powerful and unaccountable people in Washington.
The agency isn’t even beholden to the normal appropriations process because its funding comes from the Federal Reserve.
A dedicated Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director could rework a large part of America’s financial system and there’s almost nothing any elected official could do about it.
On 28 June 2019, this report concludes, President Trump and his loyal forces began their full on assault against the socialists to restore the Myers v. United States ruling issued in 1926—an assault coming in the case called Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that the US Supreme Court rocketed through their process in near record time and will hear arguments on today—is one of the most extraordinary cases ever seen in American history, because the US government doesn’t even acknowledge that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is part of it—which, in turn, caused the Supreme Court to appoint a private lawyer to defend the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—a defense sorely needed as Trump appointed US Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh has previously ruled from a lower court that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau “is a fourth branch of government created by Congress, not the Constitution, and one that goes unchecked, threatening personal freedom…Only the existence of agencies with many directors serving at the pleasure of the president guarantees the American people their liberty from overreaching governmental bureaus”—and saw Kavanaugh further warning that this socialist Consumer Financial Protection Bureau “possesses enormous power over American business, American consumers, and the overall US economy, and its director enjoys more unilateral authority than any other officer in any of the three branches of the US government”—all of which means that this case will decide who controls America—either its elected leaders and lawmakers voted into power by the American people—or these powerful socialist “Deep State” bureaucrats responsible to no one—and is why these socialists today are saying such things as “there’s a much greater chance that the Court will use this case to fundamentally alter the balance of power between the president and the federal government’s “independent” agencies”—which if does occur, as expected by nearly all experts, would make come true the lifelong dream of US Attorney General William Barr and his thousands of followers in the American legal system to make President Trump the “Unified Leader Of The Executive Branch” equaled only by the Legislative and Judicial Branches he co-shares power with and no one else.
…all of whom now work for President Donald Trump.
March 3, 2020 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.