Is the Public Being Conditioned for the Next COVID Scam with a “Lab Escaped” Killer Mutant Virus?
Viruses May Be “Watching” You – Lying in Wait Before Multiplying and Killing, read a recent headline at SciTechDaily.
The article goes on with its apocalyptic warnings:
Viruses may be ‘watching’ you – some microbes lie in wait until their hosts unintentionally give them the signal to start multiplying and kill them.
Especially after more than two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, many people picture a virus as a nasty spiked ball – essentially a mindless killer that gets into a cell and hijacks its machinery to create a gazillion copies of itself before bursting out. For many viruses, including the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, the “mindless killer” moniker is essentially true.
However, there’s more to virus biology than meets the eye.
A suitable illustration is HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. HIV is a retrovirus that does not immediately go on a killing spree when it enters a cell. Instead, it integrates itself into your chromosomes and chills, waiting for the proper opportunity to command the cell to make copies of it and burst out to infect other immune cells and eventually cause AIDS. (Full article.)
Wow! Who knew that viruses could be so intelligent, and actually participate in premeditated murder of its hosts?
Well here’s the problem: it’s all fake. Stuff like this might happen in science fiction movies or TV series, but in real life there is zero evidence of such intelligence in viruses.
The sole purpose of publishing such fiction in a pseudo-scientific publication is to create FEAR, which then can be leveraged to sell PRODUCTS, such as vaccines.
Sometimes, such as in this article, they might mingle some truth with the fiction to make it sound more realistic. In this article they (incorrectly) label “bacteriophages” as “viruses.”
As we have previously published, belief in “viruses” is a religion, not science. See this article we published back in May of this year:
Dr. Stephan Lanka’s work exposing viruses as a hoax dates back to the days when HIV research was being done, when $BILLIONS of dollars were being spent on HIV research and mRNA vaccines by the likes of Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, and most of the other COVID-19 Operation Warp Speed team, years before the dreaded “coronavirus” of 2019 appeared on the scene.
Even current CDC Director Rochelle Walensky is an “expert on HIV/AIDS” according to her Wikipedia page.
There are huge disagreements on the definition of “virus” in both the medical field as well as the alternative health media. And yet as I have researched both sides of this issue, there does appear to be one point that is not in disagreement among most, and that is the fact that “viruses,” however you define them, are NOT living organisms.
Earlier this year, Rob Verkerk PhD, founder and executive & scientific director for Alliance for Natural Health International, published an article titled: Does the virus exist? A critical need for resolution.
I strongly disagree with Verkerk’s assertion that having different perspectives on the issue of whether or not viruses exist “is the first that could do real harm to the truth and health freedom movement – a movement that’s so far been more or less united in calling out manipulated science and defects in global policy on COVID-19.”
First, why does Verkerk believe he has some perceived authority to represent the “health freedom movement,” and secondly, isn’t the hallmark of good “science” allowing debate and divergent views??
For me, divergent views and rigorous debate are the STRENGTH of the “health freedom movement,” however that is defined, and NOT its weakness.
Nevertheless, his article does provide some good information.
First, he gives a list of resources for the ‘no virus exists’ side of the debate:
Among the currently vocal protagonists of the ‘no virus exists’ side of the debate is virologist Stefan Lanka PhD (Germany), four medically trained doctors, Dr Tom Cowan (USA), Dr Sam Bailey (NZ), her husband, Dr Mark Bailey (NZ), and Dr Andrew Kaufman (USA). Health and exercise scientist, Mike Stone (USA), has done a comprehensive job coalescing most of the key arguments into a single website, viroLIEgy.com. These six are among the signatories, who include ex-Pfizer vice president Dr Mike Yeadon, formerly vice president & chief scientific officer of Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D, of the Settling the Virus Debate challenge put forward by Drs Cowan et al in July 2022.
I have not personally researched all of these sources (although I am familiar with them) other than the work of Dr. Stefan Lanka, who I have followed for years on this subject, long before the COVID-19 scam started.
After giving his own scientific credentials, Verkerk goes on to give his own perspectives on the existence of viruses:
What is meant by ‘does the virus exist’?
When people challenge the notion as to whether a virus is involved with COVID-19, their views may still differ in some fundamental respects.
Some are entirely comfortable with the notion that viruses are non-living entities consisting of a central core of either DNA or RNA, nearly always surrounded by a protein coat.
Seen in this way, viruses don’t do a bunch of things living organisms do. They don’t produce waste products, they don’t grow or develop, they lack any kind of energy metabolism, they don’t tend to respond to stimuli and they can’t reproduce (replicate) independently.
They must rely on a host so must invade the cells of living things and hijack the host cells’ replication machinery to make new copies of themselves. They can move genetic material between organisms and it is widely upheld that some 8% of the human genome is derived from ancestral retroviruses that has over eons been incorporated into our DNA, our genetic blueprint or ‘book of life’.
This general view, as it happens, is shared by the vast majority within the scientific community.(Source – emphasis added.)
So according to Verkerk, viruses, however you define them, are not living organisms which is the view held by “the vast majority within the scientific community.”
Go back to the article I referenced from SciTechDaily above, and see then how ridiculous it is to tell the public that “Viruses may be watching you – lying in wait before multiplying and killing you.”
There is something else that Verkerk writes that gives us a good indication about how these “viruses” have come to take on perceived intelligent form and inflict fear upon the world:
It’s worth recognising that viruses are in some ways more digital than living. In fact, they’re not living at all. Everything they do relies on a digital code made up of the four ‘letters’ or bases of DNA or RNA, comprised of sequences of four nitrogenous base pairs, namely adenine (A), cytosine (C), thymine (T) for DNA or uracil (U) in place of T for RNA, and guanine (G).
This is why digital technology that humans have developed, that relies on computer technology, genomics and bioinformatics, such as Next Generation Sequencing (more on that later), is able to understand the language of viruses, and is helping unravel so many of the mysteries linked to virus-host interactions. (Source.)
In other words, the technocrats from the computer age are the ones who have given “life” to these viruses, which Verkerk admits are “not living at all.”
They’re man made. They exist in computers as viruses that can infect computer code, and have nothing at all to do with living organisms.
The same can be said of “DNA,” a historically recent taxonomy that is used to try and describe something in human organisms, and is actually the basis of eugenics.
Dr. David Martin is the only one I have heard, so far, challenge this term, and to state that we don’t have DNA, only chromosomes, and that DNA is only a model, developed to weaponize nature and science. See:
With this background now on “viruses” which even the consensus of the “scientific community” admits are not living organisms, we come to recent headlines in the corporate media, which claim that “new strains” of the COVID “virus” are being developed in laboratories with deadly “kill rates.”
This first one was allegedly created at a lab at Boston University, and Daily Mail claimed to have the “exclusive” on this:
Boston University scientists were today condemned for ‘playing with fire’ after it emerged they had created a lethal new Covid strain in a laboratory.
DailyMail.com revealed the team had made a hybrid virus — combining Omicron and the original Wuhan strain — that killed 80 per cent of mice in a study.
The researchers were attempting to discover whether the spike protein on the Omicron variant – responsible for making it the most transmissible of Covid strains to date – is also behind the virus having a particularly mild effect on infected hosts, with most suffering only slight illness.
The resultant chimera was only slightly less deadly than the Wuhan strain, indicating that the spike protein is not behind the attenuation of its effects on hosts.
The team behind its creation announced that as well as ‘inflict[ing] severe disease’ it also ‘robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity’, indicating that the recombinant virus retained the most dangerous properties of its parents.
The revelation exposes how dangerous virus manipulation research continues to go on even in the US, despite fears similar practices may have started the pandemic.
Professor Shmuel Shapira, a leading scientist in the Israeli Government, said: ‘This should be totally forbidden, it’s playing with fire.’
Gain of function research – when viruses are purposefully manipulated to be more infectious or deadly – is thought to be at the center of Covid’s origin. (Source.)
Then about 10 days later, Daily Mail again ran a similar story, but this time from a lab in London:
British scientists intentionally created hybrid Covid strains in risky experiments judged to be like ‘playing with fire’, MailOnline can reveal.
Hamsters were infected with mutant viruses, blends of the original Wuhan strain and parts of either Omicron or Delta.
Critics of the research, carried out by Imperial College London, called it ‘insanity’ and warned the lab trials could, in theory, unleash a new viral threat. Twenty scientists were involved in the project, including one who sits on the Government’s advisory panel SAGE.
But the university insists the study, part-funded by the taxpayer, followed British regulations and was entirely safe.
Our revelation comes amid ongoing furore over similar experiments in the US, where authorities have proposed a crackdown on virus manipulation research. (Source.)
Ok people, put on your critical thinking caps, and consider what is really going on here.
First of all, if it was really possible to develop a “killer virus” in a laboratory, do you really think the ones developing it would want that information leaked out to the public? Notice in these media reports that there is alleged outrage over this, and yet we get two “leaks” to the media, one in the U.S. and one in Europe, within about 10 days of each other.
What is more likely going on here?
The fear over COVID-19 is subsiding, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake is also dwindling, so maybe it is time for a new “variant” to create fear, and what better way to create fear than taking a page out of the script of Hollywood movies and science fiction TV programs over “mutant viruses”?
(Notice how in many of these science fiction shows the “medical officer” is the only one who has authority to over-ride even the captain’s orders. Hollywood medical “virus” propaganda at its finest!)
There was a actually a simulation of a “high-consequence biological threat” conducted in March of 2021 hosted by the Nuclear Threat Initiative with the Munich Security Conference to “conduct a tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.” See:
The name of the virus in this simulation was the “monkeypox” virus, and it included an event where this virus would be “engineered to be vaccine-resistant.”
Since we are not hearing much about the “monkeypox virus” in the corporate news these days, could it be that they have now switched strategies to instead stick with the tried and true “COVID-19 virus” but add the additional fear factor of a mutant, lab-escaped “variant”?
With the rise of “unexplained deaths” and “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS) here in 2022, which appear to be related to COVID-19 vaccine injuries, there are some who are expecting even more deaths and injuries to happen as we progress further into the annual flu season. See:
With so many people carrying around blood clots and weakened hearts from the COVID-19 vaccines, it would be reasonable to expect that a surge in deaths and illnesses in the weeks ahead could be attributed by the “health authorities” to something new, like a lab-escaped “mutant virus” to bring about new emergency measures to develop new drugs and new vaccines for this “new variant.”
And these “leaked” news stories about lab-created “killer COVID-19 viruses” could very well be readying the masses in the public who still trust the corporate media and the corrupt government alphabet agencies to accept this new scam.
**By Brian Shilhavy