cas abuse – COURT / CAS DOUBLE STANDARD IN CASE LAW – A LAYMAN’S GUIDE

https://app.box.com/s/kdhh3gzp2s79d0ry5hmz

                COURT / CAS DOUBLE STANDARD IN CASE LAW

                  –  A LAYMAN’S GUIDE                         Pg 7 / 7

OTHER LAYMAN’S GUIDES TO READ:
45) Here’s a list of other guides on or soon to be posted on Canadacourtwatch.ORG on the‘Publications’ Page to read and consider as soon as possible when being robbed by CAS crooks.
         46)  These titles and others are planned in the future, so visit the site often and spread the word bydownloading the business card and Flyer print files posting them for others to find!  Only by doingeverything you can to correct actual problems and using Case Law rather then rhetoric is the only
way to get a court to rule your way!!
  
– How to use Disclosure     – Advanced Audio Recording– Guide to MMPI-2 Testing     – Parenting Assessment Consent– How to Deal with False CAS Affidavits   – How to Appeal CAS Crown Ward– How to Set Aside Orders by Fraud   – How to Strike out CAS  Pleadings– How to Avoid the Child Abuse Register      – (Tort)  Lawsuits and the CAS– Eliminating CAS Plausible Deniability   – Court Costs: CAS Bad Faith Acts– How to Withdraw and give the CAS the Finger!             – CAS Abuse of Qualified Privilege
– How to make Court ‘Submissions’   – How to Deal with Court Bias
– Sizing Up Your C.A.S. Case
*  L E G A L   N O T E :
This is paper is based on actual use and a guide only for the reader, your needs may vary. It’s up to each person to assesstheir own circumstances. Extra steps in your proceeding may occur due to complexity, number of parties, bad faith acts,abusive litigation. Canadacourtwatch.org cannot be responsible for use, misuse or misfortune in a proceeding. Theproceeding is not ‘legal advice’ but the experience of fellow respondents subjected to the criminal acts of your local corrupt,Perjuring, Child abusing CAS!!  Each recipient is required to assess their situation to the best of their ability, outcomesdepend on the relative strength / weaknesses /errors of each party’s case, exhibits, affidavits, submissions, case law, etc.Interactions of other Laws, Acts, Regulations and Case Law up to the recipient. No claim for errors or omissions. CFSA s45(8) applies.  CFSA and FLR rules, etc, current at time of writing.** Decisions can be downloaded from the Case Law Page at Canadacourtwatch.ORG.
(1)
  Family lawyers that cater to poor parents on legal aid certificates seldom search or use Case Law to argue cases to thebenefit their clients.
(2)
  It is well known in court the chances of a successful appeal on a bad decision involving unrepresented parents or poorparents on legal aid certificates are very low.
(3)
  Justice Madame S. M. Rogers on a case heard Nov ’08 with written decision Dec ’08.
(4)
 Family lawyers that cater to poor parents on legal aid certificates know their clients are usually uneducated or inarticulate,these lawyers feel safe engaging in ‘inadequate representation’ while abusing legal aid funding.
(5)
  Amelia M James /’Daurio’ of York Region CAS from Mar ’07 to Nov ’08 commissioned false affidavits and suppressedevidence to deny a disabled child treatment. In Jul ’10 she arranged affidavits in an Oath Helping scam claiming adoption toprevent an Appeal to obtain a treatment order.
(6)
  Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 4.01(2) (e), (f), (g) and later Hill v Church of Scientology SCC [1995]
(7)
 ‘officers of the court’ lawyers swear an oath to the court, to serve the court first as a means to install professionalimpartiality that the lawyer would be less inclined to mislead, but does not work that well.
(8)
  ‘Lie harder’ is a wag at the film ‘Die Harder’. CASs know if they’re caught lying in court one day, they can return the nextday to the same court and ‘Lie Another Day’ and still expect to abuse the ‘presumption’ of the same court!
(9)
 In many decisions there is a preoccupation with ‘fairness’ to a CAS who are actually a business funded with publicmoney, generally, no such fairness is often extended to parents without extensive prompting.
Rev 1   –   Nov  12  2014     written by:   no_ethics_at_CAS     Copyright 2014       www.canadacourtwatch.ORG  For comments, corrections or suggestions, email:                                                        no_ethics_at_the_cas@yahoo.ca         or           info@canadacourtwatch.ORG  

 

This entry was posted in * AGE - OF - AQUARIUS, * COURT CASE INFO, - CRIMES Against Humanity, - HIDDEN ♠ CONTROLLERS, - SECRET EVIL SOCIETIES, - WARS - ON HUMANITY, - WARS EVIL COMPANIES, - WARS ON RELIGION, - WORLD ♠ GANGSTERS, ♠ NEW WORLD ORDER ♠, C.A.S. & C.P.S. CRIMES, CANADA COURT WATCH, Church of Scientology, EDUCATIONAL CRIMES, HUMANS in SLAVERY, LAW ENFORCEMENT, MIND-CONTROL HUMAN, Negative REPTILIAN Beings, UNJUST FRAUD CRIMES, UNJUST THEFT CRIMES. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment