“Regarding NDA’s” – Anonymous Guest Post

“Regarding NDA’s” – Anonymous Guest Post

12:19:00 PM  Emailed, Thoughts
Entry Submitted Anonymously at 12:14 PM EDT on October 5, 2016

Sitrep should tell us the salient features of nda, what the bank is really after, and how they can be used against us ..if they cant, it means that don’t have real intel the blind leading the blind

They can still do it namelessly as a legal analysis, or post a copy online with names redacted, leaks happen all the time to prevent bank abuses of power and knowledge is power

We all must unite because when it is class action and congress gets involved, bank lose and wont dare enforce nda maliciously or even threaten to use it (which is the real purpose, shut up about our frauds or abuses or we’ll seize your $)

Wf knows Nda is illegal and not enforceable because it is one sided with no negotiation, and no benefit to one party and that is us, can still sue because we were forced to sign it so call their bluff

“NADA to NDA:)” – Guest Post by G

8:44:00 AM  Emailed, Thoughts
Entry Submitted by G at 8:30 AM EDT on October 5, 2016

This brief synopsis clearly points out the absolute hypocrisy of the NDA.

I fully understand the need to remain totally silent about this transaction from a personal safety point of view. Only a complete fool would miss that. And, yes, there are plenty of those out there as well.

But to arrest and confiscate everything from someone because they violated their own prudence and personal safety is like adding insult to injury. “Because you violated your own personal safety, we’re gonna show you the penalty for your stupidity… We gonna make it happen for you… just because we can.”

And who does that benefit? It is bad enough that Joe stupid gets hit by the cabal for loose lips… but to add white hat justice on to top of that for good measure doesn’t make any sense… unless things never really changed at all.

Go figure, Yosuf… All your ascension jazz is nothing more than a smoke screen under such circumstances.

G
http://inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.ca/2016/10/in-response-to-maverick-t-guest-post-by.html

“In Response to Maverick T” – Guest Post by G

8:18:00 AM  Emailed, Thoughts
Entry Submitted by G at 8:05 PM EDT on October 5, 2016

“I’m with You, Brother G!” – Guest Post by Maverick T

In response to Maverick T…

Thank you Maverick T. To answer your question, “Any idea of a better path they can take that keeps them with us regular do-gooders?”

Simply put, do away with the NDA’s period. According to Zap and Yosuf, people have already been picked up and had all their funds taken as a result of NDA violations on the the early private releases.

The reality is, the public is going to find out either way. The information is already out there.Someone will hear something and when the exchanges go public, all the hubbub published in Dinarland will be highlighted by reporters of the cabal trying to stir up trouble.

The issue is not the redeemers leaking info but the cabal rabble rousers trying too initiate another false flag event as a pretext for marshal law. If Grandfather and military White Hats do their job, that shouldn’t be an issue.

Regarding the average Joe public. Once they find out, they will just take it in stride like they always do. As long as they receive something from NESARA by returning their illegal back taxes somewhere along the way, they will be placated.

There really is no excuse for having these NDA’s. It is a total vote of ‘no confidence’ to those paying attention.

At some point this could come back and really bite the new powers that be in the butt. And, yes, the remaining cabal will no doubt try to play that card as well.

Treaty and no treaty, you raise the head of the world public and they in turn rise up as one person in the aftermath… and there will be hell to pay.

G