WHO Pandemic Treaty Vows to Crack Down on Disobedience
Posted on by EraOfLight — Leave a reply
By Yudi Sherman
The latest draft of the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Agreement would require countries to increase censorship and crack down on taxpayers who disobey mandates, among other measures.
Representatives of member states met in Geneva last week where they spent three days negotiating a pandemic accord “to strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness and response to prevent a repeat of the health, social and economic impacts that were caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.”
This was the seventh round of negotiations on the agreement, which is slated to be ratified next year.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) insists the treaty does not require that countries cede their sovereignty to the globalist organization, it uses pandemics as a pretext to dictate global policy.
In one clause, for example, the WHO demands that governments “encourage ceasefires in affected countries during pandemics to promote global cooperation against common global threats.” In another clause, countries must enforce “gender equality” and place women in more leadership positions to create a proper “health and care workforce.”
Other provisions in the document require governments to take an authoritarian approach to pandemics that go beyond mere regulations and extend to social engineering. In Article 17, for example, governments must not only develop public health policies but also “social policies” aimed at “mobilizing social capital in communities for mutual support.”
In Article 18 the WHO goes on to clarify that governments must promulgate “pandemic literacy” — a strategy which, like media literacy, tells the public who to trust — and suppress dissenting information.
“The Parties shall strengthen science, public health and pandemic literacy in the population, as well as access to information on pandemics and their effects and drivers, and combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through effective international collaboration and cooperation as referred to in Article 16 herein,” the agreement states.
In addition, governments should craft policies that will quash noncompliance with “public health and social measures” and to “trust in science and public health institutions.”
“The Parties shall, as appropriate, conduct research and inform policies on factors that hinder adherence to public health and social measures in a pandemic and trust in science and public health institutions,” says the document.
Member states are also enjoined to rope in the private sector for pandemic-related activities.
Governments will be permitted to withdraw from the Pandemic Agreement two years after signing it, following which the agreement will remain in effect for another year.
During that time, the WHO can declare a pandemic at any time and for any reason. Such reasons might include a virus like COVID-19, a social condition like loneliness, or a phenomenon like “climate change.”
The Pandemic Agreement requires member states to adopt an approach to healthcare called One Health, which claims that “climate change” is the driving factor behind human health. For example, warmer climates can fuel tick infestations which can bring with them deadly diseases, and changing weather patterns can cause avian flu spread.
Therefore, the One Health agenda states that because pandemic diseases are zoonotic — they spread from animals to humans — human health must be viewed in the context of animals and the environment, or what is called the “human-animal-environment interface.”
At all levels of pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, WHO member states must adhere to the One Health agenda, including in scientific research. This involves “taking a One Health approach into account in order to produce science-based evidence, including that which is related to social and behavioural sciences, and risk communication and community engagement,” says the agreement.
“The approach mobilizes multiple sectors, disciplines and communities at varying levels of society to work together to foster well-being and tackle threats to health and ecosystems, while addressing the collective need for clean water, energy and air, safe and nutritious food, taking action on climate change, and contributing to sustainable development,” the WHO adds.
**Source
Share:
Related
World Council For Health Slams WHO’s Pandemic Treaty: ‘Threat To Sovereignty & Inalienable Rights’
A coalition of doctors, scientists, lawyers, and civil rights advocacy organizations known as the World Council for Health (WCH) lambasted the World Health Organization’s (WHO) pandemic treaty as a “power grab” in a scathing open letter. The WHO’s World Health Assembly had agreed last December during a special session to establish an “intergovernmental negotiating body (INB)…03/14/2022
In “News”
Take Action: Nullify The WHO’s “Pandemic Treaty” and IHR Amendments
The WHO’s International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) recently met to finalize the proposed IHR amendments, which will further enable Covid medical tyranny (including vaccine passports) and empower international bureaucracy at the expense of American sovereignty. The World Health Assembly would then consider these amendments at its next meeting in late May. Contact…01/31/2023
In “News”
WHO Concludes 76th Assembly As Debate Over “Pandemic Treaty” Rages On
As the WHO concludes its 76th assembly, the Pandemic Treaty continues to be a hotly contested topic, with supporters claiming it will prevent future pandemics and critics warning it will end national sovereignty. “I think we’ll get an accord in place if everyone realizes that our window before this next…06/05/2023
In “News”
saintandrewstwinflame 