Reader Charles: “SUPREME COURT SITTING AS GRAND JURY JANUARY 6, 2023, CONFERENCE HEARING. Contact Public Information Office, confirmation of receipt below” – Jan 03 2023

Reader Charles: “SUPREME COURT SITTING AS GRAND JURY JANUARY 6, 2023, CONFERENCE HEARING. Contact Public Information Office, confirmation of receipt below”

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 3-Jan-2023 04:43:51
http://www.rumormill.news/214549

(Thanks, C. :)Reader Charles Miller writes:=====Dear Hobie.Please find below, SUPREME COURT SITTING AS GRAND JURY JANUARY 6, 2023, CONFERENCE HEARING, as sent and received 1:37 am, pacific 1/1/2023.HAPPY NEW YEAR all Rumor Mill News readers.
It’s our year and it’s time to go to work cleaning our house of the Republic.https://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspxSUPREME COURT SITTING AS GRAND JURY JANUARY 6, 2023, CONFERENCE HEARING.Charles C. Miller,Realtor, for the American People,1310 NW State Ave. #79,Chehalis, Washington.98532253-329-4413ccmtrusted@icloud.comDate: January 1, 2023U.S. Post; USPS Certified # 7013 2630 0000 5386 6716The American Peoples DemandFor the United States Supreme CourtTo Sit January 6, 2023 as National Grand JuryEXECUTION OF COURT RULE 17, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ACTIONRE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al;Docket No. 22-380; Supreme Court of the United States of America.Citizens, Employer, Voters Demand for Execution of the Writ of Quo Warranto.Complaint for FRAUD, THEFT, CONVERSION, BREACH OF CONTRACT,BREACH OF THE PEACE, TREASON and OTHER FELONY CHARGES.RULE 22, APPLICATION TO ALL JUSTICES INDIVIDUALLY.ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACT CIVIL ACTION, THE OATH CLAUSE.RELIEF and REMEDY SOUGHT: the People’s Prerogative Writ of Quo WarrantoBy What Authority are Defendants/Respondents Acting in the People’s Public Offices;Issued by the Justices serving the Supreme Court of the United States of America.The Court To Act in Capacity of National Grand Jury Investigating the 2020 and 2022 National Elections.REF. Captured Lower Court Public Records, Docket No. 22-380U.S. Constitution, Article VI section 2 and 3;U.S. Constitution, Article I, sections 5, 6;U.S. Constitution, Article III, section 1, 2, clause 2, 3;U.S. Constitution, Article IV, sections 2, 4;Supreme Court Rule, 22, Application to Individual Justice;Supreme Court Rule, 17, Proceeding in an Original Action;sections 1, 2.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 19, Mandatory Joinder ofAffected Party.All Writs Act, found by reference to, Title 28, United States Codesection 1651 and 1652.TO: Scott S. Harris.Clerk of the United States Of America Supreme Court.Supreme Court of the United States of America.1 First Street, NEWashington, District of Columbia.20543Attention; Individual Justices, in context of Rule 22, and 17.Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.Associate Justice Clarence ThomasAssociate Justice Sonia SotomayorAssociate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.Associate Justice Elena Kagan.Associate Justice Amy Coney BarrettAssociate Justice Neil M. GorsuchAssociate Justice Brett M. KavanaughAssociate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ( Ex Officio, Void Appointmentand Confirmation by ILLEGITIMATE posers fraudulently claiminggovernment offices. Proved by Docketing Case No. 22-380, admittingFRAUD associated to the 2020 election procedures.)To whom it may concern, Before the World:The American Peoples Writ of Quo Warranto,issued from thePeople’s one supreme Court, to operating:Supreme Court of the United States of America.TO: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence ThomasAssociate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.By What Authority could the Justices serving in the highest National Court, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, ignore fatally defective process carried out in the Congress Assembled under known circumstances implicated with fraudulent practices involving Theft and Conversion of the People’s votes and the People’s public offices in numerous States United?By what authority could the Justices serving in the highest National Court, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, fail, refuse or excuse to investigate, as in perform in capacity of a grand jury, applying all the massive investigative tools available to the Court, to expose fatally defective practices in the Congress of the United States of America?By what authority could the Justices serving in the highest National Court, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, allow under any circumstance public offices to be filled and operated by any one under the taint or cloud of fraud, particularly when the taint is related to tampering with the free will expression of the People’s political will, transferred via vote systems operated by public servants both state and federal.OVERVIEW, The American Peoples Political Power is Now to be Exercised by the one supreme Court created by the Constitution for the United States of America.FACTS.The Brunson application to the Court for the Writ of Certiorari alleges facts exposing that in the Congress of the United States, in the 2020 election process verifications, knowingly executed known public duties in a fatally defective manner.The fatal defect is the public record fact exposing that over 100 good standing Members of Congress Assembled alleged fraud in more than a few states election proceedings.The Maxim of Law, known in all law systems world wide, controls the actions of this Court and every properly seated Justice: FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING !This allegation draws in every Union State as an affected party. The contract between the States United identified as Constitution for the United States of America does not contemplate fraud being allowed to invade the sacred transfer of political power, that which created this Court and the whole of all American governments.The Court knows and has always known that when one party to a contract, the inferior party, such as the Congress Assembled, operates in a manner that affects the States and the People each represents, and that manner denies the States specific performance, integrity in election process, by ratifying fraudulent or allowing even the smallest hint of fraud, to taint the operations of public offices, a breach of contract of the highest order has been committed.The Court as a branch of the United States Government along with Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, knows and have always known that fraud or the hint of fraud, and breach of the Contract Constitutions by one of the branches of the national government, a Constitutional Crisis is in full effect.This Court as the highest national Court has at its disposal all the legal tools available to resolve the Constitutional Crisis.The question is, will this Court and its properly seated Justices act to follow the law by applying all the legal tools available, or, will the individuals sitting as Justices foreclose the Constitutional Republic as a dead entity?Charles C. Miller, is the contract holder of the Fidelity Bonds issued by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Sonia Soto mayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, verified under PRAECIPE TO CLERK; USPS Certified #:7016 0340 0000 0338 2627, posted 12/30/2022. Courtesy copy linked below.As a Beneficiary of all powers held by this Court and its Justices and employees, an American State Citizen, a Sovereign to the national government, I act as RELATOR for all the American People. The linked articles below give fair notice of some of what is being done among the American People you Justices all serve.In the event the usual misconstruction of the legal relationship between the People and our governments is contemplated, I present one of the Courts own Orders for honoring.YICK WO v HOPKINS. 118 U.S. 356 (1886)“ When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are sup- [118 U.S. 356, 370] posed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is, indeed, quite true that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration, the responsibility is purely political, no appeal lying except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion, or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts bill of rights, the government of the commonwealth ‘may be a government of laws and not of men.’ For the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself. “. ( Emphasis added )Done this 1st day of January, 2023 duly sworn under pains and penalties pursuant to the laws of the United States of America as found by reference to Title 28 United States Code section 1746(1)._____________________________Charles C. Miller.Seal._____________________________________________________________________LINKS TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES.Now circulating quite freely and widely.Please find REAL NEWS WITH REAL FACTS REPORTING REAL EVENTS from published articles. First hand testimony duly sworn. Perfect evidence.”SUPREME COURT RECEIVED ORDERS IN BRUNSON CASE.”https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=213828“TRUMP: DELIVERY THE EVIDENCE, or, IS SUBPOENA REQUIRED?”https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=213914“BRUNSON, LETTERS TO SUPREME COURT, PRESIDENT TRUMP”https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=21397870013 2630″BRUNSON CASE: GOING VIRAL?”https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=214036“BRUNSON CASE. PRAECEPI TO SUPREME COURT,”https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=214415“BRUNSON CASE FUNDAMENTALS, FOR EAZY UNDERSTANDING. TRUMPS DUTIES.”https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=214414Fair Notice, this public record document will be duly served to the 45th President, Donald Trump, with request for monitoring of the Courts activities for constitutional compliance as is the duty of the highest law enforcement office of the National government.*************************************************************

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=214549

Advertisement
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s